A bitter power struggle has erupted within the Kristo Asafo Mission of Ghana, pitting siblings against each other in a high-stakes contest for control of the church and the sprawling Kantanka business empire built by its late founder.
The Kristo Asafo Mission, also known as Christo Asafo, traces its roots to a 1969 prayer group that grew into a fully-fledged African Independent Church by 1971. Its founder, the late Apostle Emeritus Prof. Dr. Kwadwo Safo Kantanka, who passed away on September 11, 2025, fused spiritual leadership with a bold vision of African industrial self-sufficiency — a vision embodied in the Kantanka Group’s ventures into automobile manufacturing and homegrown innovation.
That dual legacy — part church, part industrial movement — is now at the center of a succession dispute that has split the founder’s family and raised hard questions about who truly inherits his mantle.
The Contenders
At the heart of the dispute are two of the founder’s children from different branches of his polygamous household.
Sarah Adwoa Safo, the eldest daughter, brings considerable institutional weight to her claim. A lawyer by training and former NPP Member of Parliament for Dome-Kwabenya who also served as a government minister, she has positioned herself as a central family leader in the aftermath of her father’s death. She announced his passing publicly, took a leading role in funeral arrangements, and has been backed by supporters who say her stance aligns with the founder’s later wishes. She has remained a visible presence at church events and in family affairs since.
Israel Kwadwo Safo — also known as Nana Kwadwo Safo Akofena, or simply Kwadwo Safo Jnr. — represents a competing claim rooted in an earlier designation. A commercial pilot and former CEO of the Kantanka Group, he was reportedly named successor by the founder under prior arrangements.
However, that designation now appears to clash with rules introduced later, and he has nonetheless moved ahead with steps toward his own installation as leader.
Old Wounds, New Battle Lines
The dispute is not emerging in a vacuum. The family has a documented history of internal friction, including reported periods of estrangement between Adwoa Safo and her father, the complexities inherent in a large polygamous household, disagreements over funeral planning, and public disclaimers distancing certain family members from Kwadwo Jnr.’s handling of family and business matters.
At its core, the conflict turns on a legal and institutional question: which governing document takes precedence — the church’s original 2017 constitution, its 2024 amended version, or the founder’s own earlier personal designations of a successor? That unresolved tension between written church law and the founder’s prior word is likely to determine not just who leads the Kristo Asafo Mission, but who controls the commercial empire built in its name.
Shockingly, the succession crisis tearing through the Kristo Asafo Mission has escalated dramatically, moving from courtrooms into gunfire.
Their argument rests squarely on constitutional grounds. The plaintiffs contend that the church’s 2017 constitution, as amended in 2024, is the supreme governing document and takes precedence over any prior personal designation by the founder. They point to specific provisions — including Article 26 — which they say require a successor to be appointed within three months of the leader’s death.
Crucially, they argue the 2024 amendments altered the line of succession itself, rendering Israel Kwadwo Safo ineligible regardless of any earlier arrangement naming him heir. The suit seeks formal declarations, injunctions, and an order blocking his installation or official recognition.
Florence Obinim Returns With A New Single “Susu Pre”
Despite the legal challenge — and reports that an injunction was sought or granted to pause proceedings pending the court’s determination — supporters of Israel Kwadwo Safo pressed ahead with his swearing-in ceremony on June 21, 2026. His camp framed the move as a call for unity and continuity with the founder’s vision. His lawyer has since spoken publicly in defense of his client’s actions amid the fallout from the shooting. The case remains active, and the legal validity of the installation itself is now in dispute.
Adding fuel to the fire, previously unseen videos and documents have resurfaced, offering contradictory accounts of the founder’s true wishes. Some materials appear to support the position that he once favored his son as successor; others, along with various allegations, suggest he later shifted toward favoring Adwoa Safo or moved to disqualify or disinherit his son altogether. Leaked audio recordings and competing family statements have only deepened public suspicion, fueling narratives on both sides accusing the other camp of misconduct or manipulation.
The dispute took a violent turn when Adwoa Safo was shot — sustaining a graze wound to the neck — after her vehicle reportedly came under fire approximately 15 times near her brother’s residence. The incident unfolded amid tensions surrounding his installation ceremony, allegedly in defiance of the standing court order.
Accounts of what happened diverge sharply. A witness has claimed armed men linked to her brother’s camp opened fire on her vehicle.
Her brother’s lawyer, however, has offered a starkly different version, alleging that Adwoa Safo rammed through a gate and fired first, prompting security personnel to respond in self-defense — an exchange that resulted in her being shot.
Police have opened an investigation into the shooting. Adwoa Safo is reported to be in stable condition. The incident has sharply escalated an already volatile family and institutional rift.
This remains a fast-developing story. The ongoing court proceedings, the results of the police investigation, and the founder’s funeral — scheduled for July 30, 2026 — could all reshape the trajectory of the dispute in the weeks ahead.